Loading
Loading
AI Investment & Control Review
Evidence from the platform. Judgment from senior advisors.
Every AI Value Ledger review pairs structured, evidence-based scoring with the professional judgment and recommendations of experienced transformation advisors, so your board gets answers it can act on, not just a dashboard.
The deliverable
One report that answers four questions with evidence, not opinion: where AI is used, whether it is compliant, which investments to back or stop, and which decisions it can be trusted with.
2.1 · Forming
1 of 5 AI-supported decisions has earned the authority it uses.
Accelerate 2 Continue 3 Restructure 1 Stop 1
| # | Action | Owner | Due |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Appoint an accountable executive for AI risk | CEO | Day 30 |
| 2 | Stop the supplier-risk pilot; reallocate budget | CFO | Day 45 |
| 3 | Test the kill switch on the pricing model | COO | Day 60 |
| 4 | Close evidence gaps on 3 high-risk systems | CIO | Day 90 |
Fictional company. All figures are illustrative and do not describe any client.
After the review
A review is only as valuable as what changes because of it. Where you want support, we take the findings through to results, with the same evidence standard.
From the findings and the 90-day agenda
A sequenced, board-ready plan that closes the gaps the review found, aligned to the EU AI Act, ISO 42001 and the NIST AI RMF. Each step has an owner, a date and the evidence that will prove it done.
From the investment calls
Independent, vendor-neutral selection of the tools and partners the roadmap requires, with support through contracting so that terms, controls and accountability are agreed before work begins.
From the decision register
Senior leadership of the transformation program, using proven project management methods to meet or exceed the agreed outcomes on scope, timeline and investment.
Led by a practitioner with a track record of leading, and recovering, complex finance and ERP/EPM transformations.